
There are a number of most interesting story lines that are part of the military action, such as:
1. The fascist powers of the day (Germany and Italy) expending great energy on behalf of Franco and the nationalists. The Nazis correctly perceived this war as a great opportunity to test military equipment and tactics; no doubt this was very helpful in the early days of WWII.
2. Stalin and the Russian communists expending great energy on behalf of the republican government. But not as effectively as the Germans. Stalin's interest was in seeing that the Spanish communist party was positioned to take over the leftist coalition after the civil war; he didn't wish to provoke Hitler. It seemed that the communists - one of the largest parts of the coalition - burned so much energy on internal politicking that might have been better turned toward the military. (And odd that Stalin entered into an alliance with Hitler, if short-lived, very quickly after the civil war ended.)

4. Yet the republican cause was viewed by idealists around the world as noble, to the point where "international brigades" with thousands of participants showed up to fight fascism. Amazing. But at this point in the 1930s, the Stalinist purges and excesses were not all that widely known, and unions, communists and socialists were not in disfavor (worldwide depression, etc.)
5. And a big chunk of the celebrity artists and writers were in support of republican Spain. Ernest Hemingway probably most prominent among them. For Whom the Bell Tolls is a great story, set entirely in the Spanish civil war.
6. The Guernica bombing.
7. Spanish vets show up on both sides in WWII, and it's easy to see why they would have been in demand. Republican types fought with the Russians; nationalist types helped the Nazis. There is a strong character in David Robbins' novel about Kursk - a Spanish civil war vet who was a tank expert. Etc.
8. I hadn't realized Franco was so tight with Hitler and Mussolini, or that he was running a first-class dictatorship right up into the 1960s. Retribution after the war apparently was just awful.
The book was quite good, though so detailed that I just blew through much of the military descriptions. I liked Beevor's Stalingrad (summarized here) better.
Click to enlarge:

No comments:
Post a Comment