"To compensate a little for the treachery and weakness of my memory, so extreme that it has happened to me more than once to pick up again, as recent and unknown to me, books which I had read carefully a few years before . . . I have adopted the habit for some time now of adding at the end of each book . . . the time I finished reading it and the judgment I have derived of it as a whole, so that this may represent to me at least the sense and general idea I had conceived of the author in reading it." (Montaigne, Book II, Essay 10 (publ. 1580))

Friday, October 23, 2015

Midnight's Children (Salman Rushdie, 1981)

Book club selection via Nicole (October 18, 2015).  Interesting to see that it appears on lists of "100 greatest novels" or all time.

I wouldn't say I loved the book, but I would say that I think I benefited - a lot from reading it.  My main downside:  I just couldn't really care about, or connect with, any of the characters.

I did care about the story arc  - India around the time of the partition - but that wasn't enough.  And the virtuoso writing doesn't move me so much.  Same problem for me as with Laurence Stern (Tristram Shandy - which I gave up on pretty quickly so haven't included on this blog) or Marquez.

The protagonist was born at midnight on India's independence day from Britain (Aug 15, 1947).  He had a huge nose (reminiscent of Sterne book, with same humor on that point).  He had super-powers to communicate with others born at the same time - "Midnight's Children."

But even that conceit didn't entirely work - seemed like Midnight's Children didn't really end up doing much of anything, and fell out of the general story line.

Something I liked:  author knew how to tell us about history without telling it directly or pedantically - I think he assumed his readers weren't looking for a direct history lesson - but he gives so much of it.  One example of a clever device:  where the protagonist is cutting letters out of the newspaper headlines as part of a plot sequence.  Guess what:  lots of history is communicated this way.

A glimpse, rare for me, of 20th century India/Pakistan/Bangladesh.

Reminder of Britain's hasty exit - no real preparation - the awful movement of peoples; what real for east-west Pakistan given geographic separation?  The depth of the antipathy Islam/Hindu.

Also liked how he revealed a lot about India/Pakistan geography:  author moves characters around:  Bombay, Karachi, Kashmir, Bangladesh, Delhi.

Monday, October 12, 2015

The Rational Optimist (Matt Ridley, 2010)

Via Paul Jr.  Had read the reviews and it met high expectations.

Essentially:  it recounts, skillfully and inventively the narrative that gets severely underplayed. That things are good; have gotten better; in all probability will continue to get better; it's rational to be an optimist!

Media gets clicks and ratings by emphasizing trouble.  Politicians chase votes by emphasizing the negatives.  Skeptics/cynics come across as smarter/more clever than optimists.

Yet the world is an immensely better place than it's been at any time in history - not even close - and there's no particular reason to think that progress will halt, let alone regress.  Even chronic bad governance - which certainly has held back, or contributed mightily to holding back, so many countries - can't overwhelm the innovation machine in all the places where it is deeply grounded.