The Silent Angel (Heinrich Boll, written 1950, published 1992)

Protagonist is a veteran German soldier - Hans Schnitzler - a hardened cynic who made going AWOL and forging papers into something of an art form in the waning days of WWII.  Setting is Cologne - in the very final days of the war, and the very first days of the postwar era.

Schnitzler searches for the widow of a comrade; has problems with her wealthy guardian.  He also runs into a widow who has just lost a baby; tries to learn how to form a relationship with her.  Schnitzler's wife also had died.  Gloomy enough - probably meaning it was realistic - such that the book supposedly was suppressed in Germany for over 40 years.

Characters struggle to cope in a new world presented to them in a thoroughly devastated city.  Where simply finding food is an adventure.  Schnitzler becomes expert at stealing coal off moving trains as a way to pay for food.  Finds a form of re-connection with the Catholic church.

Short, worthwhile.

The Coasts of Bohemia - A Czech History (Derek Sayer, 1998)

Since my wife is 3/4 Bohemian or Czech - with obvious implications for my children - it seems like a pretty good idea to learn something about this part of the world.  (For example:  where, exactly, is Bohemia?  Also:  why is a "bohemian" lifestyle associated in the first instance with artistic types residing in Paris?)

This book was interesting, and useful.  Title is a play on a line in Shakespeare - thought to be intentionally confusing about a non-existent Bohemian coastline.

Turns out that was typically is referred to as "Bohemia" roughly corresponds with the current Czech Republic; the Slovak part (to the east, and much slower to develop) was "Moravia."

Here's how I'd summarize things:

1.  This area of Europe generally slower to develop than Western Europe (let alone Mediterranean or Middle/Near East places).

2.  Sort of on the cusp of being Slavic - but fully integrated into Western Europe over time.  Until the Iron Curtain was lowered.

3.  Country peaked as an independent state in the 14th century - king named Charles (for whom the modern Charles Bridge is named).

4.  Jan Hus a big hero - anticipated the Reformation by less than 100 years.  Used in various ways over the centuries by myth-makers with varying agendas.

5.  Defenestration of Prague triggers 30 Years War (1618-1648).

6.  Prague generally getting bossed around by other countries over the centuries - primarily Austria.

7.  Czech language mostly for peasants - cultured types use German.  Limited vocabulary.

8.  Post-Napoleon - same considerations here as in so much of Europe (and elsewhere) (as discussed very effectively in this book) - nationalism and self-determinism and all sorts of other new - and generally counterproductive - ideas come to the fore.  As in so much of Europe - Czechs try to invent a long-term history to support territorial aspirations.  Folks in the villages would have been very surprised to learn how their very local customs were appropriated in support of defining (really, inventing) a national culture.

9.  Continuing Austrian/German domination.  Limited concessions to Czech-ness, whatever that meant.  Nazi abuse, quite nasty.  Richard Heydrich - we had recently seen a movie (Hangmen Also Die) in which Bertolt Brecht was involved (the only movie in which he was involved, we learned) - sadistic Nazi governor, incredible reprisals after Heydrich was assassinated.

10.  Ongoing efforts to develop Czech language, literature, etc.  Antipathy toward Germany; crescendos, not surprisingly, after WWII.

11.  The profound bizarreness of Communism.  Recent emergence.

Author discusses The Good Soldier Svejk.  And Kafka.

Before the Wall: Berlin Days (1946-1948) (George Clare, 1990)

A well-reviewed book, but I didn't find it very valuable.  At least it was a very quick read.  Author was a Viennese Jew whose parents were killed in the mayhem, thus with an interesting perspective on events in Berlin immediately following the end of WWII (he served as a translator and in various other capacities).

He addressed some of the practical problems with denazification - including the continuing need to run the country at a time when so much of the leadership could be viewed as tainted.  What a mess.

Also the shortages, and the politicking among the four occupying powers.  A pretty unique confluence of countries in a tight geography.

So the book was interesting, but not nearly as useful as this book, or this book, or especially this book.

Plagues and Peoples (William H. McNeill, 1976)

Relatively short, but quite interesting throughout.  I understand that McNeill's thinking was rather groundbreaking in the mid-70s; I've seen elements discussed in this recent (and useful) book.

His thesis:  that the role of disease has been under-appreciated when assessing historical trends.

Another main theme:  applying the notion that microscopic parasites - disease - optimize when achieving a sustainable balance with hosts.  A disease that kills off its hosts too vigorously isn't going to thrive.  When disease exposure occurs regularly among a sufficiently large population, the disease typically turns into a childhood disease - killing off some of the weak - while survivors are immune (good for microparasite and host alike).  Isolated populations are at great risk - when exposure to a new disease finally occurs, carnage among adults occurs - a much more grievous blow to the community.

It isn't so much that those themes are surprising (though that may have been the case to some extent when originally published) - the value is his application of the themes (admittedly speculative in plenty of cases) to various historical episodes.

The big example of course (also addressed at length in 1493) is the die-off in North America resulting from the Columbian Exchange.  But McNeill provides plenty of other interesting examples from around the world.

I like how he links the microparasites to what he refers to macroparasites - almost exclusively humans preying on other humans.  The same basic principle applies - if the conqueror is too savage - or demands too much in rent or taxes - the conquered population withers and isn't productive, to the conqueror's disadvantage.

Many times the macroparasites (armies) were the instrument via which microparasites were transmitted to isolated populations, to lethal effect.

More microparasites thrive in hot climates.

City-dwellers died off due to unsanitary conditions, but were less prone to die-off from diseases (large population, steady exposure to microparasites).

Shipping, caravans, armies spread diseases in olden times.  Widespread travel in 19th and 20th centuries results in fewer epidemics - most microparasites are distributed everywhere relatively quickly.

McNeill links illness-induced weakness to various conquests and power shifts.

Rise of modern medicine has put microparasites on the defensive and allowed unprecedent population surges (along with better agriculture, etc.)  McNeill expects the microparasites to keep adjusting.