(411 pages)
Somewhat similar to this collection by the same author - she writes a number of essays each interesting in its own right, the puts them in a book and seeks to bind them together by a theme that feels a little forced. But each is valuable, and the whole is much worth reading.
Four essays here -
First she reviews the "folly" of the Trojans in accepting the Greek gift. I was reading this concurrently with the Odyssey, and hadn't recalled that the Trojan horse story is recounted in the Odyssey (not the Iliad). Also hadn't recalled the role of Laocoon, and the serpent-y events that inspired the famous statues. Cassandra's gift/curse.
Next - she discusses the Renaissance popes and the events just prior to the Reformation. I've oft read about the sale of indulgences but she provides an interesting discussion here; the idea of expanding the market by ruling that indulgences can benefit poor souls in purgatory - profitable! Also interesting to think about this book about the early Church, and just how far the Church of Rome strayed from its roots by this era. Consequences of Constantine.
Third is a section reviewing the "folly" of the British government in dealing with the colonists - the view that independence was not inevitable. Lots of detail from the British perspective, most of it new. I do like that she points out that Britain wasn't "ruined" by loss of the colonies - instead Britain advanced to its apogee - mistaken belief that colonies enrich the mother country - individual entrepreneurs can and do make out quite fabulously (especially if armed with government-sanctioned monopoly) but mother country as a whole doesn't seem to profit.
Fourth is a discussion of the folly in Vietnam - so resonant with today's Middle East/Afghanistan errors. More of a focus on World War II and the French days - that part was new to me. The other aspects have been covered pretty well via the Ken Burns documentary, I also liked this book quite a bit.
Too often I read a book, and then quickly forget most of it (or all of it, for less memorable works). I'm hoping this site helps me remember at least something of what I read. (Blog commenced July 2006. Earlier posts are taken from book notes.) (Very occasional notes about movies or concerts may also appear here from time to time.)
"To compensate a little for the treachery and weakness of my memory, so extreme that it has happened to me more than once to pick up again, as recent and unknown to me, books which I had read carefully a few years before . . . I have adopted the habit for some time now of adding at the end of each book . . . the time I finished reading it and the judgment I have derived of it as a whole, so that this may represent to me at least the sense and general idea I had conceived of the author in reading it." (Montaigne, Book II, Essay 10 (publ. 1580))
Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 26, 2019
Friday, October 12, 2018
Hue 1968: A Turning Point of the American War in Vietnam (Mark Bowden, 2017)
(608 pages (including notes))
We've thought very highly of Ken Burns's (fairly) recent Vietnam War series on PBS; this book had some of the same feeling, but focused on a single battle (though with plenty of helpful surrounding detail). I liked it a great deal.
Hue as an important historical city in Vietnam - I had no idea - pretty far north in South Vietnam. A citadel and "old city" portion, heavily fortified. Cultural/historical significance, meaning US couldn't bomb it.
North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong meticulously plan to attack Hue as a featured element of Tet offensive - they realize they cannot hold it indefinitely, but believe they can make a real statement here. And they definitely did. Took over the citadel - thick walls, limited number of gates, defensive towers, moats - bigtime problems given that razing wasn't an option.
US planners and higher-ups tended to discount Tet in general, and discounted the situation in Hue in particular. Meaning regular guys are sent into ridiculously dangerous situations due to higher-ups not comprehending, at least in the early going. Author provides intimate descriptions of what can only be called raw courage - just amazing what these guys were doing - many of them truly "regular" draft fodder - many not particularly fired up to be there, but doing their jobs.
Some of that reminded of this book - so much courage seems to be bound up with the guys close by.
North Vietnam with zero air power, limited firepower of any kind - necessitating quite a bit of courage and persistence - yet also incredible cruelty, ideological purification messes, etc.
Amazing degree of press access and honesty (and bravery - these folks were in the middle of things) - post-Vietnam I believe the military keeps much tighter control over the reporting, greatly sanitized.
Recommended.
We've thought very highly of Ken Burns's (fairly) recent Vietnam War series on PBS; this book had some of the same feeling, but focused on a single battle (though with plenty of helpful surrounding detail). I liked it a great deal.
Hue as an important historical city in Vietnam - I had no idea - pretty far north in South Vietnam. A citadel and "old city" portion, heavily fortified. Cultural/historical significance, meaning US couldn't bomb it.
North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong meticulously plan to attack Hue as a featured element of Tet offensive - they realize they cannot hold it indefinitely, but believe they can make a real statement here. And they definitely did. Took over the citadel - thick walls, limited number of gates, defensive towers, moats - bigtime problems given that razing wasn't an option.
US planners and higher-ups tended to discount Tet in general, and discounted the situation in Hue in particular. Meaning regular guys are sent into ridiculously dangerous situations due to higher-ups not comprehending, at least in the early going. Author provides intimate descriptions of what can only be called raw courage - just amazing what these guys were doing - many of them truly "regular" draft fodder - many not particularly fired up to be there, but doing their jobs.
Some of that reminded of this book - so much courage seems to be bound up with the guys close by.
North Vietnam with zero air power, limited firepower of any kind - necessitating quite a bit of courage and persistence - yet also incredible cruelty, ideological purification messes, etc.
Amazing degree of press access and honesty (and bravery - these folks were in the middle of things) - post-Vietnam I believe the military keeps much tighter control over the reporting, greatly sanitized.
Recommended.
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
The Things They Carried (Tim O'Brien, 1990)
I believe this is a considered a novel, and properly so. But O'Brien mixes in his own Vietnam experiences and the effect is really powerful.I was a bit too young to grasp much of anything about the war while it was taking place - a constant topic, but we never talked with any returning veterans or did much of anything beyond following news accounts and listening to politicians blather on. The author here permitted my imagination to kick in.
Part of the effectiveness - his Midwest roots. The story of Norman Bowker is heartbreaking.
Recommended.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

