I much liked this, though I'm still considering why it worked so well. It's very unusual.
For one thing, the author is remarkably economical with words; the book is relatively short; at one level the author can't create the kind of connection with the characters that a Tolstoy can accomplish over many more pages; yet he pulls it off, and the book really works. The author truly is quite marvelous using words, it is a delight to read the book just on that level.
Perhaps my sense of connection to this work is related to the way the story line fits with other things I've been reading (though I have no doubt the story line also would stand perfectly well on its own). The story primarily is set in 1860s Sicily - a noble family experiences changes wrought by the Risorgimento (crystallizing around Garibaldi's arrival in Sicily). The Prince (Fabrizio) of the House of Salina (symbol = the leopard) - approaching 50 years in age when we meet him - is the central character. His nephew (Tancredi) appears to be nearing marriage with his daughter (Concetta) (which I guess was ok at the time), then meets the uncommonly beautiful commoner, Angelica (daughter of the nouveau riche Mayor). Father Pirrone - confessor to the Salinas - makes a trip back to his home village and experiences a marriage setup similar to that affecting the house of Salina. Interesting speeches by the Prince about the character of the Sicilians. Death of the Prince - and the passing of an era in many senses. Concetta and her sisters with the relics. Sicily itself - the importance of geography in shaping the people.
Perhaps above all - a really effective way of communicating the oft-neglected but fundamental idea: the transience of so many things on which we burn so much energy.
I'm constantly struck with how reading is self-reinforcing - each book makes other books far more interesting. For example: This book was helpful in understanding The Leopard - good discussions of the gulf that still exists between northern and southern Italy (certainly including Sicily). This book was helpful regarding the Risorgimento and the various revolutionary movements following the French Revolution (including 1848 events); with this book, it communicated the importance and incredible popularity of Garibaldi (if he was politically marginalized). This book was interesting in terms of 19th century Italian politics - how the French and Austrians intrigued in the country (and not just in the north). This and this drive home the Prince's comments about the history of Sicilian invaders, going back to classical times.
Well-known quote: "If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change." (spoken by Tancredi).
Too often I read a book, and then quickly forget most of it (or all of it, for less memorable works). I'm hoping this site helps me remember at least something of what I read. (Blog commenced July 2006. Earlier posts are taken from book notes.) (Very occasional notes about movies or concerts may also appear here from time to time.)
"To compensate a little for the treachery and weakness of my memory, so extreme that it has happened to me more than once to pick up again, as recent and unknown to me, books which I had read carefully a few years before . . . I have adopted the habit for some time now of adding at the end of each book . . . the time I finished reading it and the judgment I have derived of it as a whole, so that this may represent to me at least the sense and general idea I had conceived of the author in reading it." (Montaigne, Book II, Essay 10 (publ. 1580))
Monday, January 16, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment