Too often I read a book, and then quickly forget most of it (or all of it, for less memorable works). I'm hoping this site helps me remember at least something of what I read. (Blog commenced July 2006. Earlier posts are taken from book notes.) (Very occasional notes about movies or concerts may also appear here from time to time.)
"To compensate a little for the treachery and weakness of my memory, so extreme that it has happened to me more than once to pick up again, as recent and unknown to me, books which I had read carefully a few years before . . . I have adopted the habit for some time now of adding at the end of each book . . . the time I finished reading it and the judgment I have derived of it as a whole, so that this may represent to me at least the sense and general idea I had conceived of the author in reading it." (Montaigne, Book II, Essay 10 (publ. 1580))
Monday, December 26, 2011
Baseball in the Garden of Eden - The Secret History of the Early Game (John Thorn, 2011)
Simon and Schuster book; gift from CCG (thanks!) I hadn't even been aware that the book existed.
It was surprisingly interesting - an entirely new take, at least for me, on the origins of baseball. I had last paid attention to this topic probably 40 years, give or take - when MLB observed the 100th anniversary of the Cincinnati professional team in 1969. So I was familiar with the debunked status of Abner Doubleday, but otherwise had heard mostly about Alexander Cartwright (who also didn't "invent" anything, though at least was involved in rules development and the like). This author goes into much more background.
Thoughts:
1. I like how the author starts the book with the story of a commission that was charged with determining the origins of the game; its report, issued in 1910, identified Doubleday on flimsy evidence. The author then pushes back in time to show other sources of the game, plus devotes time to explaining why Doubleday might have been entertained as a putative parent of the game.
2. Interesting stories about "town ball," "old cat," base ball", etc. Newspaper clippings or town records reference this going back to the 18th century (usually in reference to banning play near windows, or somesuch). The "New York" version coming to the fore, the "Massachusetts" version fading.
3. If one tries to think back to the origins of the game - quite an amazing chain of events - somehow it developed that people were willing to pay money to watch a game that was barely known. The Civil War helped spread it.
4. I liked how he links the development of formalized rules, statistics, etc. to gambling. How the game was shaped in so many ways by those who would use it to make money (like there was anything wrong with that). How the game sought to sell itself as a pure, amateur endeavor - similar to college sports, and just as big a joke. 19th century "amateur" players were busted for holding sinecures with boosters or owners - just last week one of the football factories was busted for the same practice.
5. Lengthy, interesting discussions of the origins of the reserve clause, the notion of free agency, salary caps, designated hitters, prohibition of blacks, formation of rival leagues, etc. Good run-up to how the American League finally survived to join the National League.
6. Getting back to the Doubleday fabrication - there is an odd connection to the Theosophist group - some weird cult-like organization that had some following in the 19th century and into the 20th. Albert Spaulding was involved, as were his second wife and other figures tied to the sport. Civil War figure Doubleday also was heavily involved with the Theosophists. After surviving some rough patches, the powers that be in charge of baseball in 1910 were highly interested in proving an all-American, high-integrity, glossy paternity for the game. Doubleday was a great candidate (plus attractive to the Theosophists). The case for his paternity rested almost entirely on the recollections of an old man who was five years old when Doubleday invented the game in 1939 (i.e., the evidence was a joke).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment