Rather lengthy, but always interesting. Helpful in thinking about "Germany" (which always gets confusing).

Prussia emerges as a not-quite-major player in 17th century while benefiting from a series of long-serving and quite competent rulers (Frederick William (the Great Elector (reigns 1640-88)); Frederick I; Frederick William I; Frederick II (the Great - reigns 1740-86). Picks up territory via various devices. Helps that Prussia is an Elector in the Holy Roman Empire selections.
Author points out how Prussia has been portrayed - primarily in the aftermath of World War I - as a monolithic enterprise - single-mindedly given to efficiency, militarism, ruthlessness; dominated by the eastern Junker aristocracy (deeply conservative); etc. This author explains that things were much more complicated than this view (which had propaganda uses).
For one thing - there were significant divisions within Prussia, and between Prussia and the balance of Germany. Prussia included Polish (Catholic) provinces plus western provinces that weren't all that well assimilated. Bismark's 1860s defeat of Austria - followed by victory over France in 1870 - led to Prussian leadership across a mostly-combined Germany - but it was a very short time period up to 1914 - lots of variation persisted among the German areas.
I also see references that Humboldt's education system was designed to create state-serving drones - this description sounds much different. Enlightenment concepts took root, all seems quite promising; but fundamental tension between king's control over the military, and the way elections and civil matters were handled - never resolved.
Germany's position as a crossroads didn't help - constant threats from east and west - the two-front concerns of World War I and II had existed for centuries based on real problems. Keeping a large standing army was helpful for maintaining independence and influence, but downsides.
Recommended. Gift from PJr/Nedda.
No comments:
Post a Comment