Book club selection (via me; session held 13 January 2019).

Author's main thesis is that one way to look at history is to divide folks into just two camps - those who built walls, and those who lived outside them. Simplistic? Yes. But helpful, and interesting. Without walls, not much would have ever been built - the marauders were out there and all too ready to destroy. So civilization depended on walls. Yet a funny thing happened to the wall builders - they often became weak, timid - to the point where they often had to hire outside-the-wall types to serve as a defense force. Author walks through examples, including Rome.
He talks about "fear" driving the wall-builder decisions, but that seems over-wrought - sure there was an element of fear, but putting up walls and outsourcing defense seems rational; comparative advantage!
Lots of discussion in the book about the steppe hordes, China, Persia. Tough folks on the steppes, they never would have built a wall. Sparta similarly wired. Reviews the Constantinople walls. Rome with no internal walls for centuries - the legions were the walls - that changed as conditions deteriorated. Hadrian's wall.
Walls no longer all that effective for military purposes - but remain relevant, and pretty effective, for border control purposes. More walls going up in recent times than have been constructed in a long-long time - because they work, if imperfectly. Often demonized, but deep down how many folks truly believe in open borders?
We lock up our homes, fence our properties - what does that tell us?
Also discusses Berlin wall, though that was a "keep them in" situation.
Reminder: civilization is fragile. Destroying is easy relative to building.
No comments:
Post a Comment