"To compensate a little for the treachery and weakness of my memory, so extreme that it has happened to me more than once to pick up again, as recent and unknown to me, books which I had read carefully a few years before . . . I have adopted the habit for some time now of adding at the end of each book . . . the time I finished reading it and the judgment I have derived of it as a whole, so that this may represent to me at least the sense and general idea I had conceived of the author in reading it." (Montaigne, Book II, Essay 10 (publ. 1580))

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume III (Edward Gibbon, 1781)

(527 pages)

Volume I addressed here.

Volume II addressed here.

Rankings are not easy, but I'm thinking Gibbon is definitely up there with my very favorites - Proust, Thomas Mann, Chekhov.  I'll keep thinking about this.  Gibbon's writing style really works for me.  (Also he's the only one in this group who wrote in English, not sure what that tells me.)

This volume ends with the fall of Rome and the end of the western empire - dated here to 476 - concluding the more well-known part of Gibbon's work.  (Volumes IV-VI pick up with the eastern empire through the fall of Constantinople).

This volume continues the themes from Volumes I and II - decline of civic virtue; transition from paganism to Christianity; emperor as a highly dangerous occupation; barbarian tribes moving to perimeter and then into heartlands of the empire, pushed from the east.

I keep thinking I've underrated Rome's accomplishments - a world of relative security and prosperity - sure it was selective, but isn't that always the case?  Look at how Europe lived for centuries after Rome - cowering behind walls, ruined trade (therefore lost prosperity), lost technical skills, lost learning of all types.

Amazing that Christianity entirely supplanted paganism; this volume discusses the continuation of this process, all the way through formally outlawing paganism.  Gibbon has quite the way of describing Christian hierarchy - sounding mild if not laudatory (to get past censorship) but absolutely skewering various folks.

He picks up on the martyrdom/relics scam and the many bad consequences - such a rac.ket.

Learned a bit about Ravenna - I hadn't realized that surrounding water features made it very difficult to capture (unlike Rome itself) - thus attractive to emperors in this days when "the army is our wall" no longer worked well.  Not as difficult to capture as Constantinople.

Lots of discussion about the various barbarian tribes, what motivated them to migrate.  Vandals in Africa; Visigoths taking southern France and into Spain; etc.  Many were Arian.  Then along comes the Huns - lots of discussion of Attila.

Down to Odoacer.  Talk about "end of an era."

No comments: