"To compensate a little for the treachery and weakness of my memory, so extreme that it has happened to me more than once to pick up again, as recent and unknown to me, books which I had read carefully a few years before . . . I have adopted the habit for some time now of adding at the end of each book . . . the time I finished reading it and the judgment I have derived of it as a whole, so that this may represent to me at least the sense and general idea I had conceived of the author in reading it." (Montaigne, Book II, Essay 10 (publ. 1580))

Monday, March 16, 2020

Range - Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World (David Epstein, 2019)

(291 pages)

Recommended by Nick Gales, who I suspect was interested in the topic as he and Maeve think about child-raising stuff.

Book primarily is taking a look at what's become conventional wisdom lately - the idea that focused training for a kid (10,000 hours or whatever) will yield results.  Author argues that greater effectiveness is gained by folks with a broader "range".  Not that we don't need the experts - we just need to recognize that - as knowledge-specialization inevitably gets deeper and deeper in each specialty area - there's more risk of tunnel vision.

Which I think we are seeing happening in the COVID-19 response (among plenty of other fails).

I liked this book, perhaps because it reinforces my priors?  Could have been edited down quite a bit, however.

Tiger Woods early years compared to those of Phil Mickelson.

Interesting discussion about early specialization/focus for music students (author thinks it's overrated if not a negative).

He discussed Phil Tetlock and superforecasting - seems more bullish on all that than say twitter-tyrant Nassim Nicholas Taleb.

Good examples of specialist organizations getting stuck on a project, putting it out on the web, getting useful solutions from non-specialists.  Maybe it seems obvious, but I think it's widely overlooked - grabbing additional perspectives works.

No comments: